Sunday, October 2, 2016

Cow economy and another matter

I was struck by two issues in President Buhari's 56th Independence speech
- the craft in the speech, and the resolute, howbeit unsuccessful attempts to force cattle rustling onto the national security agenda.

I'll take the second first.

For reasons best known to him, President Buhari is bent on forcing cattle rustling onto the national security agenda. I am puzzled that he's doing this without giving us the benefit of information - not to say persuasion - to empathise with what ordinarily appears to be a self seeking agenda. What are the numbers and value of animals lost, on periodic basis, that makes cattle rustling a matter of national security? What indeed is the contribution of cows (one form of protein diet) to the national GDP? If the idea is to reduce herdsmen-crop farmer clashes, is it possible to establish an intersection between cattle rustling and bloody herdsmen invasions, considering that the military ground and aerial forces he mobilsed were deployed mainly to herdsmem attack-free zones of the country?

I simply do not get it.

Secondly, I must say that the Independence Day speech was bland, not inspiriong. This, once again, advertises the poor writing resource being deployed by the current Presidency. Don't you just wish that the President delivered the first part of Reuben Abati's position instead? Could it be that everyone - including the two media gurus - is terrified after the change-begins-with-me blooper?

The change in speechwriting capacity should quickly begin with them, biko.

Thursday, July 7, 2016

Appointments: Buhari vs. Jonathan

The Nigerian federation is getting more deeply divided by the day.

Some senior lawyers have argued that actions or inactions of leaders have helped and are helping to widen ethnic cracks. A recent article by US-based Dr. Okey Ndibe has questioned the inclusiveness of the appointments being made by President Muhammadu Buhari. The ethnic knives are being pulled out once again.
Those, like Ndibe, who fear that the President is pursuing a sectional agenda through his appointments point to executive-level appointments in MDAs made so far by Mr. Buhari as evidence that the president is sidelining qualified technocrats from the southern part of the country.

The response of those who support the President’s appointments are mixed. While a few have publicly expressed worries about the skewed nature of the appointments and asked for a redress, a majority seems to agree that the appointments are lopsided but justified because this was the exact same thing that President Jonathan allegedly did while he was in office. Jonathan, according to this group, filled all MDA CEO positions with southerners and Christians, to the exclusion of northerners and Muslims.

How true is this assertion that Jonathan discriminated against persons from the north in his appointments? Below is a list of appointments by Jonathan that is usually pulled out and brandished to show that this was indeed the case. This list shows six northern persons and 32 southern persons (all of them Christians!) appointed or retained by Jonathan:
1. NIMET - Dr. Anthony Anuforom (South)
2. NNPC - Eng Andrew Yakubu (North)
3. NIMASA- Patrick Apobolokemi (South)
4. PENCOM - Mrs. Chinelo Anohu Amazu (South)
5. FERMA - Engr. Chukwu Amuchi (South)
6. DPR - Mr. George Osahon (South)
7. BOI - Ms. Evelyn Oputu (South)
8. Nig Content Dev Ag- Ernest Nwanpa (South)
9. Consumer Protection Ag - Mrs Dupe Atoki (South)
10. NCC - Engr. Eugene Juwa (North)
11. NAMA - Engr Nnamdi Udoh (South)
12. NCAA - Engr Akikuotu (South)
13. FAAN - George Uriesi (South)
14. NCAT - Capt. Chinere Kalu (South)
15. SEC - Aruma Otteh (South)
16. Sovereign Wealth Fund- Uche Orjri (South)
17. NAFDAC - Dr. Paul Orhi (North)
18. FIIRO - Dr G. N Elemo (South)
19. Maritime Academy of Nig- Oron Joshua Okpo (South)
20. Railway Corporation Engr. Seyi Sijuade (South)
21. Nigeria Tourism Dev- Mrs Sally Mbanefoh (South)
22. Budget office of the Fed. - Dr. Bright Okogwu (South)
23. Standard Organisation of Nig- Dr Joseph Odumodu (South)
24. NERDC- Prof. Godswill Obioma (South)
25. NEXIM- Mrs R.R. Orya (North)
26. NBC - Emeka Nkem Mba (South)
27. ITF- Prof. Longmas Wapmuk (North)
28. NUC - Prof Okojie (South)
29. NESREA- Mrs. N.S Benebo (South)
30. MDG office- Dr. Precious Gbenio (South)
31. Surveyor General of Nig- Peter Chigozie (South)
32. Statistician Gen. of the Fed.- Dr. Yemi Kale (South)
33. Accountant Gen. of the Fed.- Mr. Jonah Otunla (South)
34. Auditor Gen. of the Fed.- Samuel Yonongo Ukura (South)
35. NOA- Mike Omieri (North)
36. News Agency of Nig. Oluremi Oyo (South)
37. NEPC- David I. Adelugba (South)
38. NEPZA- Mr. Olugbenga Kuye (South)
39. Bureau for Pub Procurement - Emeka  Eze (South)    

We did a quick online search for appointments made by Jonathan and found 44 PERSONS FROM THE NORTHERN PARTS OF NIGERIA who were appointed or retained as CEOs of MDAs by Goodluck Jonathan.

The list comprises 35 Muslims and nine (9) Christians, as follows:
 
1.        NNPC,  Joseph Dawha (Christian)
2.        Nigeria Customs Service, Alhaji Abdullahi Dikko Inde (Muslim)
3.        Bureau of Public Enterprises, Mr. Benjamin Dikki (Christian)
4.        Federal Housing Authority (FHA), Mr. Terver Gemade (Christian)
5.        Federal Inland Revenue Service, Alhaji Kabiru Mashi (Muslim)
6.        Nigerian Ports Authority, Omar Suleiman/Habib Abdulahi (Muslim
7.        Federal Mortgage Bank of Nigeria, Gimba Yaú Kumo (Muslim)
8.        INEC, Muhammadu Jega (Muslim)
9.        Petroleum Equalisation Fund, Asmau Ahmed (Muslim)
10.     Nigeria Investment Prom. Comm., Aisha Hassan-Baba (Muslim)
11.     Inspector General of Police, Suleiman Abba (Muslim)
12.     Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Bello Mahmud (Muslim)
13.     National Planning Comm. (NPC), Dr Kabir Kabo Usman (Muslim)
14.     NDIC,  Alh. Umaru Ibrahim (Muslim)
15.     FRCN, Alh. Ladan Salihu (Muslim)
16.     FERMA, Engr. Kabir Abdukkagu (Muslim)
17.     Fiscal Responsibility Commission, Alh. Aliyu Yelwa (Muslim)
18.     NAFDAC,  Dr. Paul Orhii (Christian)
19.     Industrial Training Fund, Alhaji Lawal Tudunwada (Muslim)
20.     Infrastructure Concession Reg. Commission, Aminu Diko (Muslim)
21.     Chief of Defence Staff, Alex Badeh (Christian)
22.     Energy Commission of Nigeria (ECN), Eli Jidere Bala (Christian)
23.     NASENI, Dr. Mohammed Sani Haruna (Muslim)
24.     NERFUND, Baba Miana Gimba (Muslim)
25.     NEMA, Muhammad Sani-Sidi (Muslim)
26.     NOTAP,  Engr. Umar Buba Bindir (Muslim)
27.     National Orientation Agency (NOA), Mike Omeri (Christian)
28.     NAPEP, Alhaji Muktar Tafawa Balewa (Muslim)
29.     National Security Adviser, Col. Sambo Dasuki (Muslim)
30.     National Space Research Dev. Agency,  SO Mohammed (Muslim)
31.     National Sugar Dev. Council, (NSDC), Dr. Latif Busari (Muslim)
32.     National Teachers Institute, (NTI) Ladan Sharehu (Muslim)
33.     National Vet. Research Inst., Dr Mohammed Sani Ahmed (Muslim)
34.     Nigeria Postal Service, Mr. Ibrahim Mori Baba (Muslim)
35.     Nigerian Agric Insurance Corporation, Dr. Tijani Garba (Muslim)
36.     NIGCOMSAT, Alhaji Ahmed Rufai (Muslim)
37.     Nigerian Comm Commission (NCC), Dr. Eugene Juwah (Christian)
38.     NEXIM Bank, Robert Orya (Christian)
39.     Nigerian Gas Company (NGC), Saidu Mohammed (Muslim)
40.     Nigerian Shippers' Council, Hassan Bello (Muslim)
41.     Petroleum Product Pricing Reg. Agency,  Faruk A. Ahmed (Muslim)
42.     SMEDAN, Alj. Bature Umar Masari (Muslim)
43.     Voice of Nigeria, Abubakar Jijiwa (Muslim)
44.    Industrial Training Fund,  Prof. Longmas Wapmuk (Christian)  

Our Verdict 

The claims of skewed appointments by President Goodluck Jonathan - as excuse or justification for skewed appointments by President Muhammadu Buhari - cannot therefore be sustained, on the basis of the above. On the contrary, it can be argued that Jonathan appointed more Northern Muslims than Southern Christians to head the MDAs.

Thursday, May 26, 2016

Social Etiquette for WhatsApp Group Chats

I've been hunting the Web in search of rules that I can apply for a new WhatsApp Group just created. My search led me to think through and propose the following draft to our members. We are currently debating what to add, amend, and expunge from it. If you have the same challenge as me, I hope this helps you overcome as well. Enjoy

"Welcome to our Group's Chatroom on WhatsApp. This is a network platform to share reminiscences, life experiences and challenges, intelligence,  personal and business events announcements, intellectual discussions, jokes and more.
While not seeking to proscribe free-flowing, as-the-mood-directs conversations, please note that
  1. It is not fair to launch a personal attack on someone for their comments; it's better to speak only to the issue;
  2. Many will be offended if you promote your religious beliefs: you can tell us what you believe in without preaching;
  3. Many will be put off if you start promoting your political Ideology or beliefs in the room;
  4. Some Individuals may not appreciate it if you target them to solicit or market your products or services in the room;
  5. Quite a few are offended when vulgar or insensitive remarks or comments are made in the room;
  6. Many will wonder what is going on if you carry on EXTENDED one-on-one discussion with another person, as if only two of you are in the room
  7. It is offensive to show off with your wealth, your position, or your intelligence; everyone is equal in the chatroom;
  8. Many do not appreciate being shown pornographic, gory and other off-puting Images.
  9. People generally dislike it when someone digs into their personal life or lifestyle in front of everyone else in the room;
  10. It is not fair to talk in a negative way about our peers who are not yet in the room - and those in it as well;
  11. It may not be in your overall best interest to discuss your personal financial issues, unless you're soliciting for help.
  12. It is not nice to disrupt flow of a serious, informative or useful discussion with an irrelevant or innocuous posting, perhaps to show that you don't like it or to force a change of conversation;
  13. Most people don't read long posts - you could serialize or introduce it with a summary for those types.
  14. There are legal implications to publishing or reposting libellous or other disturbing materials from doubtful or unknown sources.   
The summary of the above is for us to apply moderation and sensitivity to show respect and sensitivity to the feelings of others and to demonstrate how much we value our association and each other."
NB: If you get inspired to adopt or adapt the recommendations, kindly give us a feedback through the comment option below.


ABOUT OANIQUÉ CONSULT
Oaniqué Consult delivers reliable, high quality media and communication services to local and international clients operating in Nigeria or planning to enter into this growth market .
We provide strong editorial support, sound business intelligence, strategic business and communication plans, and deep local media connections that help promote and solidify image, expand client base, and guard reputation in both traditional and social media. 
For the many ways we assist clients set a firm foothold on this investment destination, send us a mail (oanikwe@gmail.com) check out our services here, or call Bob on +234 812 200-0536.

Sunday, April 17, 2016

Mother's Day or Mothers' Day?

Many people are wondering why Catholics don’t follow “every other Christian denomination” to celebrate Mother’s Day on the same date.
The first and most important point to note is that there is nothing Christian about the celebration of Mother’s Day as it is inaugurated and celebrated these days; it is purely a secular celebration. The modern-day version of this celebration began in the 20th century with an American lady, Anna Jarvis. As was reported, Jarvis was placing a flower on her mother’s grave and suddenly decided that this was a futile exercise. She became convinced that it would have been more worthwhile to celebrate her mom while she lived.
Thereafter, Ms Jarvis embarked on a campaign to have a day set aside in the year to honor all living moms in the US. This campaign was so successful that an American President finally issued a proclamation, followed by bills passed in congress, to recognize the second Sunday in May as Mother’s Day.
(By the way, it’s Mother’s Day, not Mothers’ Day, the way that Ann Jarvis conceived it and the way it was crafted in the Presidential Proclamation and the American laws. The American celebration is designed to honor one’s individual mother, not mothers all over the world as we have understood it in Nigeria.)
Before Jarvis, old English Christians celebrated what was called Mothering Sunday (also called Laetare Sunday) which occurred on the second Sunday of Lent. The Anglicans were later inspired by American soldiers who came to do war against Germany and introduced their secular Mother’s Day tradition. Eventually, the Anglicans decided to celebrate Mothering Sunday and Mother’s Day on the fourth Sunday of Lent. They subsequently introduced this tradition to colonial Nigeria and it has persisted to this day.
This is where the confusion about separate celebrations of Mother’s Day set in. Americans celebrate their secular Mother’s Day on the Second Sunday in May (May 10 this year), in line with a Presidential Proclamation. The English and protestant churches in Europe (as in Nigeria) have decided to celebrate both Mothering Sunday and Mother’s Day on the fourth Sunday in Lent, even though their old tradition was to mark Laetare Sunday on the Second Sunday of Lent.
It is worth noting that the old tradition of celebration has nothing to do with honoring our earthly mothers. In the beginning Laetare Sunday was instituted to honor God through the Mother Church in accordance with the message of St. Paul (Galatians 4:26) which compared the Christian and Jewish churches and declared the Christian Church as the heavenly mother that would accommodate far more children than the Synagogue. Catholics in England understood this supernatural significance of Mother Church so well that they used to go on a sort of pilgrimage to the Mother Cathedral bearing gifts and offerings as tokens of gratitude and love. While the visits were concluded in the family circle around a table on which stood a big cake, this lone cake was used as symbol to encourage the faithful to continue with the strict observance of the Lenten fast on weekdays.
The coming of American soldiers changed all that.
Mother’s Day will continue to have little appeal to Catholics during Lent because they believe that it tends to diminish the beautiful exercise of lent and the supernatural significance of Mothering Sunday. Catholics celebrate national holidays and honor good mothers. But they find it hard to substitute the Catholic bond of supernatural grace with Christ – which Mothering Sunday signifies – to the festivities of secular celebration within the same period.
Hardcore Catholics also find it a bit of an irony that our Christian brethren will bring out the drums to celebrate and honor their earthly mothers but are quick to dishonor the earthly mother of Jesus whom He handed over to us, His disciples, to be our mother and to live with us forever (John 19:26-27).
A third point to note is that the champion of this struggle, Anne Jarvis, died unfilled and sad about the celebration that she founded! She was embittered about how the event was taken over and commercialized and spent the last days of her life fighting to have the celebration abolished!
Peace.

Saturday, March 26, 2016

The Saraki Argument

Although I would want the Saraki trial to continue - to serve as deterrence to other negligent or fraudulent public officers - I can't help agreeing with those who say that the latest ruling of the Code of Conduct Tribunal is a discriminatory application of the law and an affront to fair hearing principle enshrined in our constitution.

The job of the Code of Conduct Bureau is to collate completed asset declaration forms submitted by public officers and examine them for omissions or undisclosed assets. If the Bureau finds evidence of such, the law requires that it invites the officer and confronts him or her with the proof. This is where it gets interesting, especially for those like Saraki at that time - those elected and about to assume a public office. If the officer admits that it was an honest omission, the matter dies instantly as a correction is made. If however there is a disagreement or the Board finds evidence of corruption (for those already in public office), the matter is referred to the Code of Conduct Tribunal for adjudication and/or trial. In other words, the disciplinary board is only there to resolve the issue of recalcitrant asset declarants or those who are judged to have misappropriated public assets as evidenced by their subsequent declarations while in office.

APC chieftain, ex-Gov. Bola Tinubu, escaped the Tribunal's hammer because he was able to prove that he was not invited first to the Board to defend his asset declaration before being hustled to the Tribunal to face corruption charges. Today, however, the same tribunal chair who allowed Tinubu to go because of a breach of due process by the Bureau has given Saraki a different ruling from a similar breach of due process.

This is all so tiring; I feel the frustrations of President Buhari but I lay the blame not on the judiciary but squarely on the incompetence of or sabotage from the corruption investigators.

I think there is need to ensure that the executors of the anti-corruption crusade are ready for the job. Initially, I used to think that there is a method to the madness they display through their tardiness - a kind of deliberate muddying up of the process, perhaps to create room for "negotiations" or to pull the wood over the eyes of an angry public baying for blood. Now, I'm not so sure that this is not a case of genuine negligence or lack of capacity on their part.

It is a genuine cause for worry. This is the most critical outcome that I for one would like to see from the work of the panel investigating the activities of EFCC and CCB/CCT.

As for the matter of the Senate President, it is unfortunate that the rules of the process were breached. There are two credible options left, in my view: follow due process by referring his case back to the CCB to give Saraki the fair hearing that he was denied; or follow the Tinubu precedence by dismissing the case because due process was not followed. Doing anything else, including continuing with the case,  cannot escape from being rightly perceived as vendetta and political persecution.

Friday, March 25, 2016

Lagos, their Lagos

I escaped from Lagos yesterday, after spending three days of pure torment on her roads.

I've come to the conclusion that, in order to continue to cling to this madness, a resident must carry about a bag of patience and hope (hope that the traffic situation will somehow, magically, improve in the nearest future).

Thank God I abandoned Lagos more than a dozen years ago - after spending almost 18 years of unending misery on her roads.

With what I saw in the past three days, I no longer resent the super rich who have chosen to deploy choppers and yatchs to survive Lagos while the rest of the boisterous crowd sweats it out in the sweltering standstill! The Lagos that I left yesterday has become even more of a bloody waste of fuel, time, and productivity.

But Lagosians won't have it any other way. I should know; I lived there.

Survive the Peace

Most of my friends who are APC sympathisers have advised that the government slows down or abandons it's current resort to "propaganda" and instead embrace "strategic communication" as a better strategy to win the soul of EVERYBODY and thereby inaugurate the peace it needs to govern.

I buy the objective but am not sure that the strategy is a viable option. A strategic communication programme is not implemented in a vacuum. If we go by the understanding that strategic communication is the science and art of managing two-way communication between and among a project's stakeholders, there is a presumption that we have a strategic project in place.

As far as one can see, there is no strategic vision that is being executed. Instead, what we do have are two "reactive" activities taking place - pursuing those who allegedly looted Nigeria to cough out their loot and serve jail terms, and fighting to dislodge Boko Haram insurgents from Nigeria. 

Both activities also appear to be in dire need of strategic focus. For instance, nothing has been heard about any strategic plan to prevent corruption from taking place as we speak (the 2016 Budget proposals expose the fact that corruption is alive and well.) Again, beyond the use of crude force, we should be thinking of developing strategic defense plans to engage and forestall developing harams such as the Shi'a Muslims challenge, IPOB, Fulani herdsmen, and Niger Delta Avengers, to mention but four. On economic recovery, the infrastructure development components that the administration met appear to have suddenly become more challenging to manage, including tasks that are not dependencies of Budget 2016.

I have argued elsewhere that the ministers are not to blame for resorting to propaganda to fill up the performance challenge. The real problem is that there does not appear to be any central, articulated strategy that the ministries are following. This leaves proactive ministers to articulate their best guess of a development vision based on the leader's body language, and, for the less creative, a relapse to good old propaganda.

Inexperience (or lack of capacity, as OBJ put it) will ultimately be the bane of this government if it continues to run a non-inclusive administration. Part of the problem is this resort to appointing only those the leader "feels comfortable with" - whatever the interpretation. This will inevitably rob the leader of the opportunity to take great decisions based on a robust debate at meetings, rather than one-way thinking that has defined most public policies to date. 

Let's not kid ourselves on this one: there's very little on the ground that can sustain a robust strategic communication initiative I'm afraid. And, let's not confuse strategic governance with strategic communications. Strategic communications is what you integrate in your design of a strategic governance plan. Even a non-professional like Prof. Wole Soyinka understood this - that you really have to think through the problems of the moment and take a policy position on how to deal with it. Once this is done, strategic communication helps you communicate, establish buy-in, and manage feedback in an iterative process that leads to the achievement of objective.

Governor Tambuwal is the Man

I just read the story of the release of Patience Paul, the school girl who was abducted and turned into a sex slave in Sokoto.

According to the lawyer who represented the family, Governor Aminu Tambuwal called immediately he read of the story and promptly initiated actions that got the girl freed from her abductors.

The governor's interest also ensured that the abductor was arrested by the police and would be charged to court soon.

Thumbs up to you, Your Excellency. God bless you.

Fulani Herders, the Case For

These are some of the viewpoints I've come across so far, in support of doing nothing about this problem that Nigeria is confronting, and as both herders and local farmers pay the terrible cost with their lives and their property:

1. Is it because Buhari is now in power that you want to play politics and exhibit your ethnic hatred on the issue? This is one more cheap attempt to discredit the present administration!

2. Whether we like it or not, we have to deal with the herders because we need their cows for meat.  There are no train services and bad roads make it difficult to tranport via trucks. Alternative is by foot so we have to bear it.

3. There were clashes during the last dispensation but those shouting now looked away for political reasons. The issue has now been politicised and ethnicised.

4. You'll complain when they go on strike and meat becomes scarce. Be careful what you say about them please.

5. What do you expect them to do when hundreds of their cattle are killed or rustled by local people and thieves?

6. Do we no longer have freedom of movement in Nigeria? Should we now stop the Igbos from coming to trade in the North? Why should their own be different?

QUESTION:
Which among these arguments address the problem we have on our hands? Which will most likely provoke a national search for solutions to the problem?

There are no prizes for the best answers!

Friday, February 12, 2016

A Vile Murder in the Social Media

Before you post your next FB comment on the unfolding Ese tragedy, here's an objectivity test, and it applies to all, whether you are a northerner, a wailer, an Ijaw, a Christian, Muslim or a traditional religionist. Ask yourself: "If this thing had been done to my little sister or daughter, what will I write and how?"

In other  words, cast any favorite relation of yours who is 13 in Ese's place and then write about the child undergoing psychological torture in Kano. I know this is difficult but try it; I guarantee  you will quickly sober up and curb your current excesses.

We have murdered an underage girl using the social media. For a start, the guy who took her to Kano is either 18, 20 or 22. Whichever it is, he can vote and can be jailed if convicted of an offence. He is an adult. However, this adult is being treated by the police, society, and the media as if he is a minor; no one has seen his face, no one knows what he looks like. The minor, on the other hand, is being publicly humiliated every step of the way; her photos are everywhere. The latest gossip about pregnancy ensures that she will leave the rest of her life a miserable human being and might even consider ending it all at some point.

I still see many losing their heads and continuing to write this girl into ignominy and life-long agony, while cleverly hiding behind our legion of parochialisms.

With the social media, we are increasingly losing our sense of decency, empathy, and our very humanity. Think of the human person; stop and consider what we are getting excited about - a girl who is only 13, which is a primary or junior secondary school age.

For fathers who deploy sociological disquisition to further diminish the worth of this girl child, she could have been your daughter.

I'm ashamed of any woman or girl that has ever written anything against this girl.

I feel a sharp pain each time I read the jaundiced opinions that are being served against this girl - for the simple reason that she is the daughter of a roadside food seller. We have seen that she was in school and we now know that her father is unemployed, so where was her school fees coming from? Does she have a choice other than to help her mother serve food at the roadside eatery?

I feel the pain of the poor when I read the magisterial interrogation of the morality of female roadside food sellers, while conveniently ignoring the reality that their poverty (and beauty) are the attractions for the army of depraved male patrons who prey on them.

Answer me, roadside sociologist: Given the situation at hand, is it possible that this 13-year old schoolgirl would have gone out of her way to seduce the man or the reverse is more likely to hold true?

What a country we have. Lord have mercy on our poor souls.

LAST LINE

While the Sunday Punch has finally ignited a national outrage over a 13-year old girl lured from her school and her parents and taken to the north to be converted to Islam and married off, the Premium Times has been persuaded to tell tales that cast the 13-year old as a girl of easy virtue.

The question I would like to ask Premium Times as it breaks it's exclusives is this: Have you considered the critical question whether Islam allows a young muslim boy to chat up an underage muslim girl and then whisk her off to an Imam who will then marry them without reference to her parents? Or is this possible because Ese is not a Muslim girl?

Premium Times, this journalism you're doing sucks. I thought editors are supposed to be thinking on their feet and doing things to help alleviate if not abolish the abominations that privileged people heap on the poor, the vulnerable, and defenseless in our society.

Shame dey catch me.

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

A headache called Judiciary

The judiciary is not the major problem with the anti-corruption crusade in Nigeria; the biggest headache is the MO of corruption investigations.

President Muhammadu Buhari at a town-hall meeting in Addis Ababa reportedly told Nigerians living in Ethiopia that the judiciary is his “main headache” on the current fight against corruption in Nigeria. Unfortunately, the newspapers did not offer much on the nature of this headache, beyond the three unfavourable judgements that Buhari obtained after tortuous trials duing his prior quests to become president. It was therefore difficult to judge from the reports whether the president was railing against unduly long court processes, whether he was implying that the those unfavorable judgments he received were corruptly influenced, and indeed whether this is about the ongoing corruption cases being prosecuted in our courts.

Whatever may be the case, we quite agree with the President on one thing: there is popular perception that judicial officers are being corrupted in their efforts to dispense justice. The justices are not alone; this perception pervades the entire public service space. It is a common experience that a good number of Nigerian service providers not only expect but also gently remind those they serve to part with some cash for the same services they are being paid to render. Since our judges are service providers and Nigerians, it would not be out of place to expect that there are bad eggs among them. It is also not a peculiar Nigerian problem. Ours is but a matter of degree. Is there a country in the world where a rotten judge has never been found?

There is one thing about the Nigerian judiciary that attracts popular perception as a major headache - the laws as they apply to the rich and the poor. To illustrate, we have read reports that a man who was caught selling weed under the Ojota bridge in Lagos State was sentenced to life imprisonment! There was also the story of a young man who stole a governor’s phone and used it to defraud people of less than N5million and was sentenced to serve 10 years in prison without an option of fine. On the other side of the social divide, we read of an ex-governor who was fined N3million for stealing N25billion from his state and the period he spent in detention was taken as sufficient punishment for the crime. A top civil servant was recently sentenced to serve six years in jail but was given an option to pay a fine of N750,000 for stealing N32.8 billion from the Police Pensions Fund. To lay people like us, all of this give the impression that the rich and the poor are judged by different standards in the application of our criminal law.

Thinking about it is enough to give any moral being a headache. If these are therefore the basis of the President's headache, he is justified. But we suspect, based on the newspaper reports, that the president is adverting his mind on something else which the common man does not see as a headache - election matters in court and the elite suspicion that judgments can and are being bought. The politicians are entitled to their court headaches and should leave us out of it.

We would like to see as our headache, the current war against corruption that our president is waging. The main headache as I see it is not the judiciary; the trouble is with the modus operandi of corruption investigations. Contrary to the government’s narrative that “corruption is fighting back,” following public and social media outcry on the tenor of investigations, specifically its human rights abuse dimension, the reality is that the quality of investigations of public officials who allegedly looted the state is not top class. Investigators should not be seen to be issuing bulletins or perceived to be authorizing leaks during a large-scale project such as recovering massive funds looted from the treasury by serving or former government officials. This is what Bishop Kukah likens to drumming and whistling in a bush where one hopes to catch a monkey. In civilised climes, such investigations are conducted quietly, unobtrusively and thoroughly and, when done, all confirmed collaborators are arrested at the same time and charged for multiple offences that lead to easy recoveries of the stolen money. This will not give room for other culprits to try other methods of hiding their loot. None will be given the opportunity to jump into the APC ship where they hope to avoid prosecution. It will be impossible to negotiate with investigators to prepare a watery case that will lead to slap-wrist judgements. Judges will not be presented with loopholes that smart lawyers will exploit to assist those who are destroying the nation to escape justice.

Why do the DSS and the EFCC elect to do their work in this manner? My suspicion is that the federal investigators are merely trying to help the president give us the impression that the war on corruption is being fought vigorously. No worse strategy could have been contemplated. Imagine what a difference it would have made to the image of the country - and the government - if 50 persons, for example, were to be arrested across the country in one day and charged to court for stealing a specified amount of money – after a thorough investigation! The present method is what my people liken to an impetuous farmer who breaks the yam while standing to harvest only to squat thereafter in a bid to carefully dig it out.

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

Rev. Fr. Mbaka's Lemon

The news is that Rev. Fr. Ejike Mbaka, the stormy petrel of the Catholic Church, has been transferred from GRA Enugu to a parish at Emene as a resident priest.

For the record, a resident priest is an official guest in a parish where he is posted to carry out a special assignment. The resident priest is not involved in the running of the parish to which he has been posted but is enlisted to say Mass in the parish.

I presume that Rev. Fr. Mbaka's special assignment is the development of his Adoration Ministry's permanent site for which he had acquired hectares of land at the same location.

What then is the issue here?

His transfer is good for the church because it restores discipline. No active priest is ordinarily allowed to stay for more than 10 years in one parish - that luxury is reserved only for Bishops and the Pope. Father Mbaka reportedly stayed 20.

His transfer is a good omen for residents of Abakaliki Rd GRA who have had to endure his ministry's boisterous weekly spiritual events in a residential neighbourhood .

The transfer is good for Rev Fr. Mbaka himself as he is freed from parish duties for now in order to concentrate on developing his Ministry.

He can immediately deploy bulldozers and, in a matter of days, open a temporary adoration site and structure therein. He may even deploy free buses to ensure that the faithful get to the event ground.
In other words, if Fr. Mbaka feels he has been handed a lemon, nothing stops him from making lemonade from it.